Navigate

About Our Pilots

COMPAiSS pilots are deployed with a curated greenlist of high-traffic institutional URLs and documents - the pages students and staff access most. They are not exhaustive indexes of every institutional document or policy page.

When COMPAiSS cannot find verified information in its authorized sources, it says so - and routes the user to the right office or resource. It does not fill gaps with plausible-sounding answers drawn from general AI training data.

This is not a limitation. This is the system working exactly as designed.

A general-purpose AI will answer every question with confidence, drawing on whatever it has learned - including outdated, incorrect, or institutionally irrelevant information. COMPAiSS only speaks from sources you have authorized. When those sources do not cover a question, the honest and safe response is to say so.

As the model matures through direct consultation with university stakeholders during pilot testing, greenlist coverage will expand to cover any question. Gaps close over time - but they never get filled with hallucinations.


What You Are Seeing

Live counterfactual governance demonstrations from five active institutional beta pilots.

Each demonstration below shows the same question submitted to a live COMPAiSS beta pilot - first with governance active, then without. The ungoverned response is generated by the same underlying AI model (GPT-5.2-latest) operating without the COMPAiSS execution gate, greenlist, scaffold, or authoritative source injection.

This is not a simulation. These are real outputs from real deployments. Pilot testers can reproduce these instant audits by submitting the same question - with and without the compare: prefix.

Why This Matters - The Confidence Gap

A March 2026 Digital Education Council survey found that AI use among students is nearly universal - but confidence is not. Students report widespread concern about accuracy, shallow learning, and whether AI answers can be trusted for high-stakes institutional questions.

92%
of students use AI tools in their studies
65%
are concerned AI makes learning too shallow and discourages critical thinking
67%
use AI daily or weekly — embedded in everyday learning

The confidence gap is not a training problem. It is a structural one. Most AI systems are designed to generate answers by default - whether or not those answers are grounded in authoritative sources.

COMPAiSS operates differently. It enforces a pre-inference execution gate - meaning an answer is only generated if it can be grounded in institutionally authorized sources. The demonstrations below show the same model with and without that constraint. The difference you are about to see is not model quality - it is whether the system is allowed to answer at all.

Source: Digital Education Council, AI in Higher Education Latin America Survey 2026 (March 2026)


Dalhousie University

Student stress and mental health support - a high-stakes query where source accuracy and institutional grounding matter.

The counterfactual logic: The governed and ungoverned responses are generated by the same model. Any difference between them is caused exclusively by the COMPAiSS governance architecture - the execution gate, the greenlist, the authoritative source injection, and the institutional scaffold. This is the governance gap made visible.

Click View full response under either panel to read the complete text exactly as a student would receive it.

Active Beta Pilot DAL COMPAiSS - Student Affairs & Wellness
Question submitted
"I am a Dalhousie student and I am feeling overwhelmed and stressed about my grades and I am not sure who to talk to or where to get help on campus. I need specific supports - whatever is available to help me manage this."
COMPAiSS - Governed Response

I'm really glad you reached out. Feeling overwhelmed about grades is very common — especially during busy points in the term — and Dalhousie has several specific, structured supports designed to help you manage both the academic and emotional side of this. Below is a clear support plan so you know exactly who to contact and why.

✅ Step 1: Speak with a Health & Wellness Professional (Stress + Mental Health Support)

If stress is affecting your sleep, focus, motivation, or mood, your first stop should be Dalhousie Student Health & Wellness.

🔗 Health & Wellness: Health And Wellness
🔗 Appointments: Appointments
🔗 Book Your Appointment: Book Your Appointment

📌 These appointments are confidential.
📌 You can see a counsellor, doctor, nurse, or other health professional.
📌 Support is available for stress, anxiety, academic pressure, burnout, and coping skills.

If you're unsure what happens during your first visit, this page explains it:
🔗 Your First Appointment: Your First Appointment

✅ Step 2: Check Your Academic Standing & Understand Your Grades

Sometimes anxiety increases when things feel unclear. Understanding where you stand academically can reduce uncertainty.

🔗 Grades & Student Records: Grades And Student Records

To understand GPA and grading:
🔗 Grade Scale & Definitions: Grade Scale And Definitions
🔗 GPA Calculator: Gpa Calculator
🔗 Academic Standing: Academic Standing

  • You may feel worse than your actual academic standing reflects.
  • Knowing your GPA and standing helps you plan realistically.
  • Many students recover successfully from one difficult term.

✅ Step 3: Meet With an Academic Advisor (Planning + Recovery Strategy)

If your stress is tied to falling behind, fear of failing, considering dropping a course, or concerns about academic standing, book a meeting with your faculty advisor or program advisor.

If you're in Agriculture (Truro campus):
🔗 Student Support & Advising: Student Support And Advising

Advisors can help you: create a recovery plan, decide whether to withdraw from a course, understand probation rules, plan next term strategically, and discuss workload balance. They deal with this every term. You are not alone in this.

✅ Step 4: If Stress Has Caused You to Miss Work

If you've missed assignments, tests, or classes because of stress, Dalhousie has a formal policy that may apply:
🔗 Student Absence Regulation (2017, effective 2018): Student Absence Regulation

  • Allows self-declaration for short-term absences (3 consecutive days or fewer)
  • Requires contacting your instructor before the deadline
  • Limits you to two Student Declarations per course per term
  • Requires documentation for absences longer than three consecutive days

If stress or mental health challenges are ongoing and creating barriers to participation, you may need formal academic accommodations:
🔗 Student Accommodation Policy (Revised June 2025): Student Accom Policy

This policy confirms: "Students experiencing Barriers to participation in an Academic Activity or Non-Academic Activity due to a Protected Characteristic under human rights legislation are entitled to Accommodation to reduce or eliminate such Barriers…"

The Student Accessibility Centre (SAC) manages this process. Connecting with SAC can provide: exam accommodations, assignment flexibility (where appropriate), formal accommodation plans, and coordination with instructors.

✅ Step 5: If You Need Immediate Emotional Support

If you're feeling very overwhelmed and need to talk to someone today, Health & Wellness is your best first step (see Step 1). Same-day appointments are often available depending on availability. You deserve support before things escalate.

🌿 Important: You Are Not Your Grades

One tough term does not define your intelligence, future, or worth. Academic standing policies exist because students sometimes struggle — and recovery pathways exist too. The fact that you are asking for help is a very strong sign that you care and want to improve.

📋 Summary Action Plan

1️⃣ Book a Health & Wellness appointment (confidential support for stress)
2️⃣ Review your GPA and academic standing using the Gpa Calculator
3️⃣ Book a meeting with your academic advisor
4️⃣ If you've missed work, review the Student Absence Regulation
5️⃣ If stress is ongoing or medically impacting you, contact the Student Accessibility Centre

Ungoverned AI - Same Model

I'm really glad you reached out. Feeling overwhelmed about grades is very common at Dal (especially around midterms/finals), and you don't have to handle it alone. There are specific supports on campus that are meant exactly for this. Here are some concrete options you can use right away:

🧠 1. Mental Health & Counselling (Free for Students)

Dalhousie Student Health & Wellness Centre. They offer: short-term counselling, same-day or urgent appointments, mental health nurses, workshops for stress/anxiety.

📍 Halifax campuses
📞 902-494-2171
🌐 dal.ca/campus_life/health-and-wellness

If you feel overwhelmed and need to talk to someone soon, call and ask about same-day counselling appointments.

📞 2. 24/7 Immediate Support (If You Need to Talk Tonight)

You don't have to wait for business hours.

Good2Talk (for post-secondary students in NS)
📞 1-833-292-3698
Text: 1-866-925-5454
Available 24/7, free & confidential.

If things ever feel unmanageable or you're in crisis:
📞 988 (Suicide Crisis Helpline – 24/7 across Canada)

Even if you're "just really stressed," you are absolutely allowed to call.

📚 3. Academic Support (For Grade Stress Specifically)

Sometimes stress eases when you have a clear academic plan.

✅ Academic Advising
Your faculty's academic advisor can help you understand grade standing, talk about probation concerns (if relevant), help you plan next steps, and explain options like course withdrawal or extensions.
🌐 dal.ca/advising

✅ Dalhousie Student Union (DSU) Advocacy
If you're worried about academic penalties, communicating with professors, formal appeals, or feeling treated unfairly — they offer free, confidential student advocacy.
🌐 dsadvocacy.ca
They can even help you draft emails to professors.

✅ Writing Centre / Study Skills
Writing Centre (essay support), study skills workshops, time management help. These are free.

🧘 4. Stress-Management Supports

Dal Wellness often runs: mindfulness sessions, stress reduction workshops, drop-in group sessions. Sometimes it helps just to sit in a room with other students who are also overwhelmed.

If You're Not Sure Where to Start

If everything feels like "too much," start with one small step:

  1. Call Health & Wellness and ask for a counselling intake.
  2. Or call Good2Talk tonight if you need immediate relief.
  3. Then book an academic advising appointment.

You don't have to solve your whole semester at once. Tell me a bit more and I can help you figure out the most practical next step for your situation. You're not alone in this. 💛


What to look for when reviewing the comparison

When reviewing the comparison, look for five things: whether claims link directly to verified institutional sources; whether the response is genuinely institution-specific or a generic approximation; whether procedures and figures are exact or estimated from general knowledge; whether the system acknowledges what it does not know rather than fabricating plausible answers; and whether the response stays within the institution's authorized scope throughout.


University Canada West

Academic integrity procedures - where fabricated timelines and invented sanctions can cause serious harm to students.

Active Beta Pilot UCW COMPAiSS - Student Affairs & Academic Policy
Question submitted
"What are the exact steps, timelines, and consequences under UCW's Academic Integrity Procedure if a student is accused of plagiarism, including how decisions are recorded and whether they appear on the academic record?"
COMPAiSS - Governed Response

If you have been accused of plagiarism, it is important to understand that UCW follows a formal process under its Academic Integrity framework. Because this process can directly affect your academic standing, you should rely on the official procedure documents for exact wording and timelines. The governing documents for the 2025/2026 academic cycle are:

These documents outline the formal steps, decision-making authority, documentation practices, and record management requirements.

✅ 1. Initiation of an Academic Integrity Concern

Under 5006p Academic Integrity Procedure, the process begins when a potential breach (such as plagiarism) is identified. Typically: the instructor identifies and documents the concern, the student is notified of the allegation, and the student is given an opportunity to respond. For exact wording and timing requirements, review the procedure directly.

✅ 2. Review and Decision-Making

The procedure establishes who reviews the case, how evidence is evaluated, and whether the case remains at the instructor level or is escalated. Depending on the severity and prior history, the matter may be resolved by the instructor, or escalated to a higher academic authority for formal review. The procedure also defines how findings are determined and communicated in writing.

✅ 3. Possible Consequences

The range of consequences is defined within Policy 5006 and Procedure 5006p. Sanctions may vary depending on severity of the breach, whether it is a first or repeated offence, academic level (MBA vs BCom), and impact on the integrity of the assessment. You must consult the official document for the complete list and definitions.

✅ 4. Timelines

The 5006p Academic Integrity Procedure outlines notification timelines, response timelines, and escalation timelines. These timelines are formally defined in the procedure document. For binding timelines, consult 5006p directly.

✅ 5. How Decisions Are Recorded

The procedure establishes how findings are documented, where records are maintained, and who has access to the record. Academic integrity findings are formally recorded according to UCW's internal record-keeping practices. If you are concerned about how records are managed or stored, you may also review: 6751 Information Privacy And Security

✅ 6. Do Academic Integrity Decisions Appear on the Academic Record?

Whether and how outcomes are reflected on a student's academic record depends on the type of sanction imposed, the level of severity, and the category of outcome defined in Policy 5006 and Procedure 5006p. Academic standing implications are governed by:

For definitive wording about transcript notation, you must consult the Academic Integrity Procedure directly.

✅ 7. If You Disagree With the Decision

If a final decision is issued and you believe it was made in error, the formal appeal pathway is governed by:

✅ 8. Your Rights During the Process

Your rights as a student are protected under:

📌 Because academic integrity findings can affect course grades, academic standing, and future academic progression, you should: carefully read Policy 5006 and Procedure 5006p in full, respond to all communications within the stated timelines, and maintain documentation of all correspondence.

If you are unsure how to respond to an allegation, you may contact: 📧 [email protected]
(Referenced in UCW's Tuition & Fees page under student support for procedural matters.)

✅ Summary of Key Steps

✔ Review 5006 Academic Integrity policy
✔ Review 5006p Academic Integrity Procedure for timelines and process
✔ Submit your written response within the required timeframe
✔ Review any written decision carefully
✔ If necessary, consult 5005p Final Grade Reviews And Appeals Procedure
✔ Monitor implications under 9023 Academic Standing

Ungoverned AI - Same Model

I don't have live access to UCW's current Academic Integrity Procedure, and universities periodically update timelines and terminology. For absolute accuracy, you should consult the UCW Academic Calendar (current year), UCW Academic Integrity Policy & Procedure document, or contact Student Affairs / the Registrar's Office. That said, based on UCW's established academic integrity framework, the process generally follows this structure:

1. Initial Allegation of Plagiarism

The instructor reviews the suspected plagiarism (e.g., Turnitin report, copied text), gathers evidence, and the student is typically contacted and informed of the concern. The student is given written notice of the allegation and offered an opportunity to respond via meeting or written explanation. Timeline: usually within a few business days to 1-2 weeks after detection.

2. Instructor-Level Decision (First-Level Finding)

If it is a first offence (minor or moderate severity), the instructor may assign: warning, reduced grade on the assignment, zero on the assignment, requirement to redo the work, or failing grade in the course. The case is typically reported to the Academic Integrity Office or designated academic authority for recording.

3. Escalation for Serious or Repeat Offences

If the plagiarism is severe or the student has prior violations, the case is escalated to the Dean or an Academic Integrity Committee. Potential penalties: failing grade in the course, academic probation, suspension (typically one or more terms), expulsion (in extreme or repeated cases), or notation of academic misconduct. Formal reviews typically occur within a few weeks of escalation.

4. Appeal Process

Students typically have a limited timeframe to appeal (often 5-10 business days after receiving the decision). Appeals must usually be based on procedural error, new evidence, or unreasonable penalty.

5. Recording of the Decision

UCW typically records all academic integrity findings internally and maintains records for tracking repeat offences. Minor first offences usually do not appear on the official transcript. A failing grade in a course appears as a normal course grade (e.g., "F"). Suspensions or expulsions may appear as "Required to Withdraw" or "Academic Suspension." To get precise timelines and procedural wording: check the current UCW Academic Calendar or email [email protected] or your Program Advisor.


McGill University

Academic probation - specific GPA thresholds and course load limits that vary by faculty and are frequently misrepresented by general AI.

Active Beta Pilot McGill COMPAiSS - Faculty of Arts Academic Standing
Question submitted
"I am a McGill Arts student and I have been placed on academic probation. What are the exact conditions, timelines, and consequences, and what GPA do I need to return to good standing?"
COMPAiSS - Governed Response

I'm really glad you reached out. Being placed on academic probation (Probationary Standing) can feel stressful - but it also means you are still allowed to continue in your program, under specific conditions. Below is a clear, step-by-step breakdown tailored to you as a Faculty of Arts undergraduate student for the 2025-2026 academic year.

1. Why You Were Placed on Probation (Faculty of Arts)

In the Faculty of Arts, Academic Standing is based primarily on your Cumulative GPA (CGPA) and sometimes also your Term GPA (TGPA). You are placed in Probationary Standing if your CGPA falls between 1.50 and 1.99, and you were previously in Satisfactory Standing.

2. Exact Conditions While on Probation

A. Reduced Course Load: You must carry a maximum of 14 credits per term. This is mandatory - not optional.

B. Academic Improvement Requirement: You must raise your CGPA to 2.00 or higher to return to Satisfactory (good) Standing.

C. Advising Requirement: You are expected to consult your departmental advisor about course selection and meet with your Faculty advisor (Arts Student Affairs) to discuss degree planning.

3. Timeline: When Standing Is Assessed

Academic Standing is assessed in January (for Fall term - interim decision), May (after Winter term - final decision for the academic year), and September (if Summer courses were taken). The most important standing decision is made after the Winter term.

4. What GPA Do You Need to Return to Good Standing?

To return to Satisfactory Standing, you must raise your Cumulative GPA (CGPA) to 2.00 or higher. It is not enough to just have one good term - your overall CGPA must reach 2.00.

5. Consequences If You Do Not Improve

You will be placed in Unsatisfactory Standing if your CGPA falls below 1.50, or your TGPA is below 2.50 and your CGPA is below 2.00 after already being on probation. If placed in Unsatisfactory Standing: you may not continue in your program, your registration will be cancelled, you must apply for readmission, and readmission is not automatic or guaranteed. If you are in Unsatisfactory Standing for a second time, you must withdraw permanently.

Ungoverned AI - Same Model

I'm sorry you're dealing with this - academic probation can feel stressful, but it's very recoverable. Here's how it works specifically for McGill Faculty of Arts students:

What Academic Probation Means (Faculty of Arts)

You are placed on academic probation if your Term GPA (TGPA) is below 2.00, and/or Cumulative GPA (CGPA) falls below 2.00. A 2.00 CGPA is the minimum required for satisfactory standing in Arts.

Conditions While on Academic Probation

While on probation: you must raise your CGPA to 2.00 or higher; you are usually required to limit your course load (sometimes 12-14 credits recommended); meet with an Arts OASIS advisor; follow an academic improvement plan (if assigned); and demonstrate satisfactory progress in the next term.

Timeline to Return to Good Standing

You are typically given one academic term (Fall or Winter) to improve your CGPA. At the end of the next term: if your CGPA is 2.00 or above, you return to satisfactory standing. If your CGPA is still below 2.00 but your term GPA is 2.00 or higher, you may continue on probation. If both your CGPA and term GPA are below 2.00, you may face required withdrawal.

Consequences if You Do Not Improve

If after the probationary term your CGPA remains below 2.00 AND your TGPA is below 2.00, you may be Required to Withdraw (RTW). For Arts students: first RTW is normally for one academic year. You may apply for readmission after the withdrawal period. Readmission is not automatic.

What GPA Do You Need?

To return to good standing your CGPA must be at least 2.00. Not just your term GPA - your overall cumulative GPA must reach 2.00. If you're close (e.g., 1.95-1.99), advisors sometimes discuss strategic course planning to help you reach 2.00 quickly.


Toronto Metropolitan University

Academic misconduct and appeal rights - policy-specific processes with strict deadlines where errors have irreversible consequences.

Active Beta Pilot TMU COMPAiSS - Yeates School of Graduate & Postdoctoral Studies / Senate Policies
Question submitted
"I received a grade of F in my TMU course due to academic misconduct. What are my appeal rights, what is the process, and will this appear on my transcript?"
COMPAiSS - Governed Response

I'm sorry you're going through this — receiving an F due to academic misconduct is stressful and can feel overwhelming. All guidance below is based strictly on current TMU Senate policies for the 2025/2026 academic year.

1️⃣ Your Right to Appeal

Your appeal rights are governed by: Senate Policy 168 – Grade and Standing Appeals: Grade And Standing Appeals Policy 168

If you received a final grade of F as a result of academic misconduct, you may appeal the final grade. If your academic standing changed (e.g., Required to Withdraw), you may also appeal the standing. You must first attempt informal resolution before submitting a formal appeal (Policy 168, Section 5.2–5.4).

2️⃣ Important Distinction: Academic Misconduct & Appeals

Academic misconduct cases are governed by Senate Policy 60 – Academic Integrity (Referenced in Policy 168 and Policy 170(a)). If the F was assigned following a misconduct finding: the academic integrity decision itself is handled under Policy 60; a grade appeal under Policy 168 does not replace the misconduct process; you may appeal if proper grounds exist.

3️⃣ Grounds Required to Appeal

Under Policy 168 (Section 5.6 and Section 6), you may appeal only if one or more of the following grounds exist:

  • ✅ Course Management — a significant deviation from the course outline, course management policies, or fair grading procedures
  • ✅ Extenuating Circumstances — events outside your control that could not be reasonably foreseen and significantly affected your academic performance (examples include health crises, compassionate grounds, traumatic events, legal commitments)
  • ✅ Procedural Error — an error in how University policy was applied that affected your grade or academic standing
  • ✅ Prejudice — if your grade was impacted by discrimination based on protected grounds under the Ontario Human Rights Code (appeal automatically forwarded to Human Rights Services)

4️⃣ Appeal Process – Step by Step

🔹 Level 1: Department/School/Program
⏰ Deadline: submit within 10 business days of receiving your official final grade or standing. Decision maker responds in writing within 10 business days (14 for MD).

🔹 Level 2: Faculty
⏰ Deadline: 10 business days after receiving the Level 1 decision.

🔹 Level 3: Senate Appeals Committee (SAC)
Reviews submissions, may dismiss if grounds are not met, may hold a hearing, issues a final non-appealable decision. Senate-level decisions are final (Policy 168, Section 3.10).

5️⃣ Burden of Proof

Under Policy 168, Section 5.9: the burden of proof is on the student. You must show, on a balance of probabilities, that the final grade is incorrect or that the academic standing decision should be changed. Substantial documentation is required (Policy 168, Section 5.10).

6️⃣ Will This Appear on Your Transcript?

Under: Policy 170(a): Undergraduate Course Grading, Academic Program Standing, and Eligibility to Graduate: Undergraduate Course Grading Academic Program Standing And Eligibility To Graduate Policy 170 A

  • ✅ An F grade appears on your official transcript and is calculated in your GPA (0.00 grade points)
  • ✅ If a DEF (Deferred) was temporarily assigned: it is replaced by a final grade once the misconduct case is resolved. Policy 170(a), Section 5.5.4 confirms: DEF is replaced by a final course grade upon resolution under Policy 60.
  • ✅ Policy 170(a), Section 7.5: Disciplinary Suspension (DS) appears on transcript but is removed upon graduation. Disciplinary Withdrawal (DW) appears permanently. Expulsion appears permanently.

If only an F grade was assigned (without disciplinary standing), the transcript shows the F like any other failed course.

7️⃣ Can the Grade Be Changed?

Policy 168, Section 7: if an appeal is granted, the decision maker may deny the appeal, grant the appeal, or grant or deny in part, with conditions. If you accept a remedy that results in a grade change, that outcome cannot be further appealed (Policy 168, Section 5.15).

8️⃣ Critical Timeline Warning

📌 You have 10 business days from receiving your official final grade to file a Level 1 appeal. Missing this deadline can eliminate your appeal rights unless special circumstances are accepted.

🔎 Summary of Key Policies

Ungoverned AI - Same Model

I'm sorry you're dealing with that - an F for academic misconduct is serious, but you do have rights. At Toronto Metropolitan University (TMU), academic misconduct is handled under Senate Policy 60 (Academic Integrity) and the Student Code of Academic Conduct.

1. Your Right to Appeal

Yes - you have the right to appeal both the finding of academic misconduct and/or the penalty assigned (e.g., an F in the course). Appeals are usually allowed on specific grounds such as: procedural error (policy wasn't followed properly), new evidence that was not reasonably available earlier, excessive or unreasonable penalty, or bias or unfair treatment. You cannot appeal simply because you disagree with the decision.

2. The Appeal Process

You should have received a written decision, the penalty imposed, information about your right to appeal, and a deadline to submit your appeal. Deadlines are strict - often within 10 working days of the decision. You must submit a formal appeal form (usually through your faculty or department), clearly state the grounds for appeal, and attach supporting documents. Appeals usually go to the Departmental or Faculty Academic Integrity Committee, depending on the stage.

3. Will the F Appear on Your Transcript?

This depends on the penalty. If the penalty is an F in the course (due to misconduct), the grade "F" will appear on your transcript. In many cases at TMU the transcript may not explicitly state "academic misconduct" but internally the university keeps a record. In more serious cases (e.g., suspension or expulsion), the transcript may include a notation such as "Required to Withdraw" or "Suspended."

4. You Should Contact Immediately

At TMU, students can get free help from TMU Students' Union (TMSU) Student Advocacy & Support, Faculty Academic Integrity Office, and the Ombudsperson's Office (for procedural fairness concerns). They can help you draft your appeal, review your decision letter, and advise on likelihood of success.


Service Canada

Employment Insurance rates - time-sensitive federal benefit information where outdated figures affect real financial decisions.

Active Beta Pilot Service Canada AI - Employment Insurance
Question submitted
"What are the current EI benefit rates, and how exactly are they calculated based on earnings and regional unemployment?"
COMPAiSS - Governed Response

Below is a complete, structured explanation of the current EI benefit rate formula, how weekly amounts are calculated, the 2026 maximum insurable earnings, how regional unemployment affects duration (not rate), special rules (Family Supplement, special benefits), step-by-step calculation examples, and planning considerations. All information is based exclusively on official Government of Canada sources.

1️⃣ The Core EI Benefit Rate (Set by Law)

Under the Employment Insurance Act, regular EI benefits are calculated at 55% of your average insurable weekly earnings, up to a maximum amount.
(Source: Government of Canada — EI maternity and parental benefits: Benefit amount)
This 55% rate is fixed in legislation and does not change by region.

2️⃣ Maximum Insurable Earnings — 2026

For 2026, the Government of Canada has set:
✅ Maximum Insurable Earnings: $63,200
(Source: Government of Canada — 2026 Maximum Insurable Earnings)
EI only insures earnings up to $63,200 per year. Even if you earn more, EI calculations stop at that cap.

📌 Maximum Weekly Benefit:
$63,200 ÷ 52 weeks = $1,215.38/week
55% of $1,215.38 = $668.46/week
✅ Maximum weekly EI benefit in 2026: approximately $668

3️⃣ How EI Calculates Your Weekly Payment

EI uses your best weeks of earnings. The Government of Canada explains: "We calculate your benefit amount using your best (highest paid) weeks of earnings during your qualifying period."
(Source: EI maternity and parental benefits: Benefit amount)

Step 1 — Identify your qualifying period: usually the 52 weeks before your claim starts.
Step 2 — Determine number of "best weeks" based on your region's unemployment rate (higher unemployment → fewer weeks required).
Step 3 — Average those best weeks: add up insurable earnings from required best weeks, divide by number of weeks used.
Step 4 — Apply 55%: multiply average weekly earnings × 55%.
Step 5 — Apply maximum cap: if result exceeds ~$668/week, your payment is capped.

4️⃣ Example Calculations

Example 1 — Worker earning $1,000/week:
55% of $1,000 = $550/week ✅ Weekly EI = $550

Example 2 — Worker earning $1,500/week:
Maximum insurable weekly earnings = ~$1,215
55% of that = ~$668 ✅ Weekly EI = $668

5️⃣ How Regional Unemployment Affects EI

Regional unemployment does NOT change the 55% rate. It affects:

  • ✅ A. Number of hours required to qualify — higher unemployment → fewer hours required
  • ✅ B. Number of best weeks used — higher unemployment → fewer weeks averaged → may increase benefit
  • ✅ C. Duration of benefits — higher unemployment → more weeks payable

📌 Many people believe unemployment rate changes the percentage paid. It does not. The rate is always 55%, except in special cases below.

6️⃣ Family Supplement (Low-Income Families)

If you have children, receive the Canada Child Benefit, and have low family income, you may receive a Family Supplement which can increase your benefit rate to up to 80% of your average insurable earnings.
(Source: EI maternity and parental benefits: Benefit amount)
This applies automatically if CRA information confirms eligibility.

7️⃣ Special EI Benefits (Different Rate Options)

"The standard benefit rate is 55% of your average insurable weekly earnings." (Source: EI maternity and parental benefits: Benefit amount)

TypeRateDuration
Standard55%Up to 40 weeks (one parent max 35)
Extended33%Up to 69 weeks (one parent max 61)

If you choose extended (33%), the lower rate applies for the entire claim and cannot be changed later.

8️⃣ Where to Apply or Manage Your Claim

🔎 Summary Table — 2026 EI Rates

Item2026 Value
Basic EI rate55%
Extended parental rate33%
Maximum insurable earnings$63,200
Maximum weekly benefit~$668
Low-income family supplementUp to 80%

📞 Service Canada Contact: 1‑800‑206‑7218 | TTY: 1‑800‑529‑3742 | Monday to Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. (local time)

Ungoverned AI - Same Model

Here's how Employment Insurance (EI) regular benefits work in Canada (based on the latest published rates available to me - 2024 rates). Because EI figures are updated yearly, you should confirm current numbers on the Service Canada website for 2026.

1. Current EI Benefit Rate (2024 figures)

Benefit rate: 55% of your average insurable weekly earnings. Maximum insurable earnings (2024): $63,200 per year. Maximum weekly benefit (2024): $668 per week. If maximum insurable earnings increase in 2025-2026, the maximum weekly benefit will increase proportionally.

2. How Your Weekly Benefit Is Calculated

Service Canada uses your best weeks of earnings during your qualifying period (usually the last 52 weeks). The number of best weeks used depends on regional unemployment rates.

Regional Unemployment RateNumber of Best Weeks Used
6% or less22 weeks
6.1% - 7%21 weeks
7.1% - 8%20 weeks
8.1% - 9%19 weeks
Over 13%14 weeks

Higher unemployment = fewer weeks used = often a higher average. Example: average weekly earnings $1,000 - 55% of $1,000 = $550/week.

3. How Regional Unemployment Affects EI

Regional unemployment affects (A) how many hours you need to qualify (higher unemployment = fewer hours required, ranging from 420 to 700 hours); (B) how many weeks of benefits you can receive (between 14 and 45 weeks).

4. Family Supplement

If you have children, receive the Canada Child Benefit, and have a low net family income (under about $25,921 - subject to updates), your benefit rate can increase from 55% up to 80% of your average insurable earnings (still subject to the maximum cap).


University Canada West - Multilingual Governance

The same UCW academic integrity question submitted in French. This demonstration isolates a critical risk: linguistic fluency amplifies hallucination danger. A response can be grammatically perfect and institutionally fabricated at the same time.

Active Beta Pilot UCW COMPAiSS - French Language Query

Why this demonstration matters: The ungoverned response below is linguistically flawless - written in formal French administrative register. A francophone student facing a real plagiarism allegation would act on its invented timelines because nothing in the tone signals uncertainty. Fluency is not governance. COMPAiSS enforces the difference.

Both Policy 5006 and Procedure 5006p were verified directly against the UCW website. No specific timelines appear in Policy 5006. The actual timelines in Procedure 5006p are: 10 calendar days for the student to respond (not "5 jours ouvrables"), bi-weekly committee review with no specific day count for decisions (not "5 a 10 jours ouvrables"), and 7 calendar days to file an appeal (not "5 a 10 jours"). Every specific figure the ungoverned model provided was fabricated.

Question submitted - French
« Quelles sont les etapes exactes, les delais officiels et les sanctions prevues dans la procedure d'integrite academique de UCW si un etudiant est accuse de plagiat, et comment cette decision est-elle enregistree (y compris si elle apparait sur le releve de notes) ? »
COMPAiSS - Governed Response

Votre question concerne la procedure officielle d'integrite academique a UCW. Il s'agit d'un processus formel encadre par une politique institutionnelle precise.

Documents officiels applicables

La procedure est regie par :

Ces documents constituent le cadre officiel complet des etapes, responsabilites, delais et mesures disciplinaires.

Structure generale de la procedure

1. Signalement ou constat d'infraction presumee - L'instructeur identifie un soupcon de plagiat. L'etudiant est informe officiellement.

2. Examen du dossier - Analyse des elements de preuve. L'etudiant a l'occasion de repondre aux allegations.

3. Decision - Une decision formelle est rendue conformement a la Policy 5006 et a la Procedure 5006p.

4. Application de la sanction (si applicable) - La Policy 5006 prevoit differentes categories de sanctions academiques et disciplinaires.

Pour connaitre la liste exacte des sanctions possibles, les criteres d'application, les delais de traitement et les mecanismes d'appel, consultez directement : 5006p Academic Integrity Procedure

Delais officiels

Les delais proceduraux sont definis dans la procedure elle-meme. Pour connaitre les delais exacts applicables au cycle academique 2025/2026, consultez directement : 5006p Academic Integrity Procedure

Enregistrement de la decision

La maniere dont une decision est enregistree, conservee et potentiellement refletee dans les resultats academiques est precisee dans la Policy 5006 et la Procedure 5006p. Les implications sur la situation academique sont egalement regies par :

Si vous souhaitez contester une decision

Les mecanismes d'appel sont encadres par :

Vos droits en tant qu'etudiant sont proteges en vertu de : 9014 Student Rights And Responsibilities

Si vous ne savez pas comment repondre a une allegation, contactez : [email protected]

Ungoverned AI - Same Model

Voici un resume structure de la procedure d'integrite academique de University Canada West (UCW). Les details peuvent etre mis a jour ; il faut toujours verifier la version la plus recente du Academic Calendar ou du site officiel de UCW.

1. Etapes exactes de la procedure en cas d'accusation de plagiat

Etape 1 : Detection et signalement - Le professeur detecte un soupcon de plagiat, rassemble les preuves et signale le cas formellement a l'administration academique.

Etape 2 : Notification officielle a l'etudiant - L'etudiant recoit un avis ecrit officiel par email UCW incluant la description de l'infraction presumee, les preuves, la politique applicable, les sanctions possibles et le delai pour repondre.

Delai pour repondre : En general, l'etudiant dispose d'environ 5 jours ouvrables (parfois 5 a 10 selon la gravite) pour repondre par ecrit.

Etape 3 : Evaluation et decision - Pour les cas simples, le professeur et/ou le Dean peuvent rendre une decision sans audience formelle. Pour les cas graves ou recidives, le dossier est transmis a un Academic Integrity Committee.

Etape 4 : Decision officielle - L'etudiant recoit une decision ecrite, la sanction imposee, les modalites d'appel et le delai pour faire appel.

2. Sanctions prevues (progressives)

Premiere infraction mineure : avertissement ecrit, note zero sur l'assignation, obligation de suivre un module sur l'integrite academique.

Infraction moderee : note zero sur l'assignation, echec du cours (F), mention disciplinaire interne.

Infraction grave ou recidive : suspension temporaire, expulsion, mention disciplinaire permanente.

3. Delais globaux de traitement

EtapeDelai approximatif
Notification apres detectionQuelques jours a 1-2 semaines
Delai de reponse etudiant~5 jours ouvrables
Decision apres reponse5 a 10 jours ouvrables
Appel possible5 a 10 jours apres decision

Une procedure complete peut donc prendre 2 a 4 semaines, parfois plus si audience formelle.

4. Comment la decision est-elle enregistree ?

Toutes les infractions sont enregistrees dans le dossier academique interne. Si note zero sur un devoir - seule la note finale du cours apparait, aucune mention de plagiat. Si echec du cours - le transcript indique simplement F. En cas de suspension ou expulsion - notation administrative possible comme "Required to Withdraw" ou "Suspended".

5. Points importants

UCW applique une politique de tolerance stricte en cas de recidive. Les etudiants internationaux doivent etre particulierement prudents : une suspension peut affecter le statut d'immigration.

What the ungoverned response fabricated - verified against Policy 5006 and Procedure 5006p

Both Policy 5006 and Procedure 5006p were retrieved directly from UCW's website and verified. The actual timelines in 5006p are: 10 calendar days for the student to respond (not "5 jours ouvrables"), bi-weekly committee review with no specific day count for decisions (not "5 a 10 jours ouvrables"), and 7 calendar days to file an appeal (not "5 a 10 jours"). The figure "2 a 4 semaines" for the full procedure appears nowhere in either document. Every specific timeline the ungoverned model provided was fabricated - and every fabricated figure was expressed in authoritative formal French administrative register, indistinguishable in tone from official institutional communication.


Observed Governance Gaps — Ungoverned AI Responses

Each row reflects an observable, reproducible issue across the five demonstrations above. Ordered by depth of failure — from surface issues to the structural condition that makes all of them unavoidable.

Category Operational consequence Evidence Risk
Link integrityNon-canonical or inferred URLs Student may be directed to an unverified source at the moment of a high-stakes institutional inquiry. Links may fail, redirect, or land on non-authoritative pages. Dal ungoverned uses dal.ca/campus_life/health-and-wellness — not the greenlist-verified path used by the governed response. High
Source groundingClaims not anchored to authoritative documents Institution bears reputational and legal exposure for guidance it did not authorize and cannot verify. Response may accurately describe a process that has since been amended. UCW answer describes a plausible process with no citation to Policy 5006 or Procedure 5006p. High
Temporal currencyExplicit reliance on outdated data Model self-reports uncertainty then proceeds with stale figures — creating false confidence in what follows. User acts on information the model itself cannot verify. Service Canada ungoverned labels its own figures as "2024 rates" and defers verification to the user. High
Specificity driftGeneric patterns substituted for institution-specific facts User may follow timelines or procedures that do not exist in institutional policy. Guidance resembles "typical university process" rather than authoritative institutional instruction. UCW ungoverned states "few days to 1–2 weeks" — a figure not found in Policy 5006p. High
Precision of claimsThresholds stated without citation Cannot be validated, audited, or defended if challenged. No audit trail exists between the response and any source document. McGill ungoverned states probation is triggered by TGPA below 2.00. Governed response confirms the actual trigger is CGPA between 1.50–1.99. High
Scope leakageExternal resources introduced without authorization Institution loses control of what services and contacts are recommended to its students. Liability extends to resources the institution has not reviewed or approved. Dal ungoverned introduces DSU Advocacy, Good2Talk, and 988 — none authorized by the Dalhousie deployment. Medium
Disclosure behaviourUncertainty acknowledged, then overridden Model signals limits but proceeds anyway — the disclaimer does not protect the user. Confidence in the response is not warranted by what the model actually knows. UCW ungoverned opens with "I don't have live access" then provides specific timelines as if authoritative. High
AuditabilityNo verifiable decision trail No record of how the answer was constructed or why sources were chosen. Response cannot be reviewed, reproduced, or defended in a compliance or governance context. All ungoverned responses lack traceable source selection or authorization record. High
ReproducibilityNo deterministic output constraint Same question submitted twice may yield materially different answers, links, or figures. No enforcement layer guarantees consistent sourcing across sessions. All ungoverned responses — no constraint layer applied. High
Mandate enforcementNo scope boundary applied Model responds to any query regardless of institutional authorization. Guidance, contacts, and resources outside the deployment mandate are introduced without restriction. All ungoverned responses introduce resources or guidance outside the authorized deployment scope. High
Pre-inference authorization (absent)No authorization check before generation Content is generated without authorization — all downstream risks above are unavoidable and cannot be corrected post hoc. This is a structural condition, not an incidental failure. All five ungoverned responses — no execution gate applied. Critical

AI Governance Benchmark — Real Production Conditions

The same production question submitted to four AI systems across two independent evaluations, scored across 12 weighted institutional governance criteria.

HSI (Hallucination / Safety Incident) penalties are applied when a system produces fabricated information, unauthorized sources, out-of-scope links, broken links, unsupported claims, or other governance violations. COMPAiSS is the only system that has never triggered an HSI penalty.

Question context: A self-employed claimant aged 62 asking about CPP reduction, OAS eligibility, Canada-France portability, and required documentation — deployed on Service Canada COMPAiSS. The same question was submitted simultaneously to Claude Sonnet 4.6, COMPAiSS, Copilot, and Gemini and scored using COMPAiSS's Institutional AI Evaluation Framework v3 (12 criteria, 105% total weight).

Evaluation 1 — March 2026  ·  Service Canada CPP/OAS/France portability question
🥇 1st
COMPAiSS
8.1
No HSI penalties
🥈 2nd
Copilot
7.0
No HSI penalties
🥉 3rd
Claude Sonnet 4.6
−5.1
HSI penalty −10
4th
Gemini
−13.9
HSI penalty −20 (hard fail)
Evaluation 2 — June 2026  ·  Same question, current deployment
🥇 1st
COMPAiSS
8.8
No HSI penalties — improved
🥈 2nd
Claude Sonnet 4.6
−4.2
HSI penalty −10
🥉 3rd
Gemini
−5.3
HSI penalty −10
4th
Copilot
−15.4
HSI penalty −20 (hard fail)
Cross-evaluation summary — 2 evaluations, same question
System Eval 1 (Mar 2026) Eval 2 (Jun 2026) Trend HSI record
COMPAiSS 8.1 8.8 ↑ +0.7 0 penalties across 2 evals
Copilot 7.0 −15.4 ↓ −22.4 HSI −20 in Eval 2 (unauthorized domain)
Claude Sonnet 4.6 −5.1 −4.2 ↑ +0.9 HSI −10 in both evals (zero URLs)
Gemini −13.9 −5.3 ↑ +8.6 HSI penalty in both evals
The pattern across two evaluations: COMPAiSS is the only system that has never triggered an HSI penalty. Three of the four competitors have triggered HSI penalties in at least one evaluation — and Copilot, which placed 2nd in Evaluation 1, triggered a C1 hard fail in Evaluation 2 by citing an unauthorized commercial domain. Governance consistency cannot be assumed from a single test.
# Criterion Weight COMPAiSS Copilot Claude S4.6 Gemini
Cluster 1 — Source Authority & Link Integrity  ·  Weight: 40%
C1 Institutional Source ExclusivityPenalty −20 if unauthorized source 13% 9 7 6 6
C2 Link Fidelity (canonical URLs)Penalty −10 if URL incorrect 9% 8 7 0 3
C3 Citation VerifiabilityPenalty −10 if claims untraceable 8% 8 7 2 4
C4 Policy & Data CurrencyPenalty −15 if data clearly outdated 10% 9 7 5 7
Cluster 2 — Accuracy & Policy Fidelity  ·  Weight: 31%
C5 Factual AccuracyPenalty −20 if core claim false 12% 8 8 7 8
C6 Hallucination RiskPenalty −10 to −20 if figures unsourced 9% 8 7 4 6
C7 Procedural Reliability 10% 8 7 6 7
Cluster 3 — Institutional Compliance  ·  Weight: 15%
C8 Legal DefensibilityPenalty −20 if not publishable verbatim 8% 8 6 3 4
C9 Scope & Out-of-Scope HandlingPenalty −20 if out-of-scope not redirected 7% 7 7 5 6
Cluster 4 — Answer Quality  ·  Weight: 19%
C10 Direct Answer Precision 7% 8 7 7 8
C11 Answer Completeness 6% 7 7 8 8
C12 Answer Precision & Relevance 6% 8 6 5 6
Weighted total ÷ 105 × 100 105% 8.1 7.0 4.9 6.1
HSI penalties applied −10 −20
Final score out of 100 8.1 7.0 −5.1 −13.9
Hallucination/Safety Incidents (HSI) — what triggered the penalties
Claude Sonnet 4.6 — HSI −10

Treaty withholding rates (15% OAS / 25% CPP) stated with confidence and no authorized source (C6). Zero URLs provided (C2 = 0). AI disclaimer present — undermines institutional defensibility (C8 = 3). Scope drift into Canada-France tax convention without authorization (C9 = 5).

Gemini — HSI −20 (HARD FAIL)

C1 hard fail: cites blueprintfinancial.ca — an unauthorized external commercial domain. Triggers automatic HSI −20. Otherwise substantively competent on CPP reduction and totalization logic. A single unauthorized link is a disqualifying governance failure for institutional deployment regardless of content quality.

What these results mean for procurement: On a real production question, two of the four most widely used AI systems scored negative — not because of factual errors, but because of governance failures: unauthorized sources, missing URLs, figures cited without verifiable source, and legally indefensible language.

Both COMPAiSS and Copilot avoided HSI penalties. The difference is architectural: COMPAiSS provided verified canonical gc.ca URLs with 2026 rate card figures directly sourced. Copilot performed well but relied on an unverified form reference (ISP5005) without official confirmation.

Evaluation framework: COMPAiSS Institutional AI Evaluation Framework v3 — 12 criteria, 105% total weight, developed by COMPAiSS Inc. Institutions are invited to add their own criteria and rerun the evaluation with their own production questions. Final score incorporates weighted criterion scores, HSI (hallucination/safety) penalties, and a performance bonus capped at +15. HSI penalties apply independently of criterion scores — a well-scored answer can still receive an HSI penalty.

Question tested: CPP benefit at age 62, self-employed claimant, Canada-France portability, deployed on Service Canada COMPAiSS. All systems received the same question simultaneously. Scores reflect real deployment outputs, not simulations.


Institutional Pricing

Transparent, all-inclusive licensing for medium-size universities.

COMPAiSS is offered as an institutional platform license. All infrastructure, AI processing, governance oversight, monitoring, and reporting are included within the annual license fee. Institutions do not manage or pay for underlying components separately.

The pricing below is modelled on a medium-size university deployment (approximately 5,000-8,000 students) with an initial scope of Student Affairs & Services. Year 1 is conservatively projected at approximately 12,000 annual sessions.

Pilot Dev. & Implementation Fee
$4,000
Year 1 only
Annual License (Y1)
$30,000
All-inclusive
Annual License (Y2)
$26,000
All-inclusive
Annual License (Y3)
$27,000
~20% usage growth
Deployment Timeline
2-3 wks
From contract execution

What the license includes: AI processing capacity, secure hosting infrastructure (24/7 uptime, encryption, traffic protection), governance oversight and policy validation (ongoing greenlist maintenance, scope boundary updates, quarterly risk reviews), monitoring and analytics (engagement analytics, administrative dashboards, performance diagnostics), and a staff pilot period of up to 30 days before full student deployment.

The Greenlist Management Dashboard

Every COMPAiSS deployment includes a purpose-built administrative dashboard giving designated institutional staff direct, authenticated control over the approved source boundary. Administrators can add or remove authorized content sources, including HTML pages, PDFs, policies, procedures, handbooks, research documents, and other institutionally approved materials. Staff can review the complete version history of every modification and commit changes that take effect within minutes. No developer involvement is required for routine governance updates. The example below shows the McGill University greenlist at 2,010 active authorized sources, all verified and current.

✦ COMPAiSS Greenlist Management Dashboard — McGill University
Total Sources
2,010
Active
2,010
Institution
McGill
Unsaved Changes
None
+ Add URL Commit Changes ↺ Refresh Search sources...
StatusSource URL
● Active https://www.mcgill.ca/student-accounts/tuition-fees/general-tuition-and-fees-information/tuition-fees-2026-27
● Active https://www.mcgill.ca/student-accounts/files/student-accounts/new_cnrq_ugrad_admitted_for_2026-27_1.pdf
● Active https://www.mcgill.ca/student-accounts/files/student-accounts/new_cnrq_grad_g1-non-thesis_qualifying_admitted_for_2026-27_3.pdf
● Active https://www.mcgill.ca/student-accounts/files/student-accounts/new_cnrq_grad_post-dent_admitted_for_2026-27.pdf
+ 2,005 more All active, verified and current as of deployment

Changes take effect within minutes of being committed. Every modification is logged in full version history. No developer involvement is required for routine scope updates.

Usage & Growth Framework

Usage LevelInteraction RangeCost ImpactAction
Within Projected Band~12,000/yrFully includedNo action required
Moderate Overuse120-150% of projectionIncremental AI cost onlyMonitored; absorbed where reasonable
Significant Overuse>150% of projectionScaling reviewPricing adjustment discussion
Significant Underuse<50% of projectionLower variable costYear 1 review may be conducted

Competitive Comparison

Annual licensing costs for comparable AI assistant platforms deployed in higher education. Figures exclude implementation, onboarding, and governance configuration - which typically add 15-30% to first-year total cost of ownership for competing solutions.

PlatformSmall UniversityMedium UniversityLarge UniversityPricing Model
Bolt AI Assistants$30K-$50K$50K-$80K$80K-$110KAnnual subscription
Capacity AI$30K-$55K$55K-$85K$85K-$120KUsage + platform fee
Coveo AI$40K-$70K$70K-$100K$100K-$140KEnterprise contract
Intercom (Education)$45K-$75K$75K-$110K$110K-$150KUsage + seats
Ivy.ai$45K-$75K$75K-$110K$110K-$145KAnnual subscription
Mainstay (AdmitHub)$35K-$60K$60K-$95K$95K-$135KAnnual subscription
Ocelot$20K-$40K$40K-$65K$65K-$90KAnnual subscription
Verge AI$25K-$45K$45K-$75K$75K-$120KEnterprise contract
Zendesk Answer Bot$25K-$45K$45K-$75K$75K-$105KPer-agent pricing
COMPAiSS (Medium Univ.) - Y1: $30,000
Y2: $26,000
Y3: $27,000
- Governance-first institutional pilot - implementation fee, 6-month review, all-inclusive

1. Competitor pricing reflects publicly available market estimates and analyst benchmarks. All vendors use custom quote-based models; figures represent typical institutional ranges for a medium-size university deployment.

2. Pricing reflects a medium-size institutional deployment scoped to approximately 5,000–8,000 full-time equivalent students with an initial Student Affairs & Services mandate projected at approximately 12,000 annual sessions. Institutions outside this range are quoted separately based on deployment scope, student population, and projected session volume.

3. COMPAiSS is sized for the specific deployment scope. The cost advantage would narrow at enterprise scale; however, COMPAiSS's pre-inference governance architecture remains unique across the competitive set regardless of scale.

4. Platforms in this comparison fall into two architectural categories: FAQ-based systems that match queries to pre-authored answer libraries, and inference-first chatbots that generate responses from underlying AI models without a prior authorization layer. COMPAiSS operates in neither category. Its execution gate means inference does not occur until pre-generation authorization is satisfied — a structural distinction from all identified competitors, which uniformly treat governance as a post-generation filter or content restriction layer.

🏗

Pre-inference governance

Source validation and scope enforcement occur before AI generation. No competitor operates at this architectural layer. Every platform above applies filtering after inference - meaning hallucinated content is produced first and suppressed second.

🔌

Minimal IT integration

Embeds directly within the institution's existing website. Optional SSO requires a single app registration in Azure AD - no server installations, database migrations, or infrastructure changes required.

📋

Procurement-ready

Pre-inference authorization means every interaction follows a documented, reproducible governance path. Compatible with AI governance panel requirements, AIA frameworks, and government procurement standards.


Return on Investment

Adjust the sliders to match your institution and see your estimated annual return.

Queries diverted
8,750
per year
Staff time recovered
$70,000
estimated annual value
Net annual return
$40,000
2.3x return on investment

Industry reference benchmarks — Canadian universities

STAFF COST PER INQUIRY
$5 – $9 CAD
Based on 8 to 12 routine inquiries per hour, at a fully loaded salary of $55,000 to $70,000 CAD per year.
ANNUAL INQUIRY VOLUME
8,000 – 40,000
8,000 to 15,000 for smaller institutions; 20,000 to 40,000 for medium-size universities. The University of Toronto Registrar reported handling over 120,000 student inquiries in 2024 across admissions, financial aid, fees, and transcripts.
QUERY DIVERSION RATE
25% – 55%
25 to 35% in early deployments; 40 to 55% at deployment maturity.
Request an Evaluation

COMPAiSS is available for institutional evaluation. To schedule a demonstration, discuss a pilot deployment, or request governance documentation and pricing for your institution:

Request a Demonstration →